• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

Revive

The coalition for grouse moor reform

  • Why REVIVE?
    • Scotland’s Grouse Moors
    • Snaring & Trapping
    • Mountain Hare Culling
    • Land Use
    • Mass outdoor medication
    • Public health
    • Environmental Damage
    • Killing protected birds of prey
    • Tracks, roads and fencing
  • The Coalition
  • News & Events
  • Get Involved
  • Videos & Media
  • Contact
  • Publications
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Tracks, roads and fencing

October 12, 2018 by

Off-road constructed vehicle tracks (often referred to as ‘hilltracks’) can ease access for land management purposes but can also have major visual and environmental impacts, particularly on the wilder landscapes for which Scotland is so highly-regarded.

The consequence has been the construction of thousands of kilometres of tracks in often sensitive upland environments. Grouse moor management has been a major contributor to the proliferation of hill tracks.

To reduce the prevalence of ticks (which can transmit disease to red grouse and thus impact on grouse densities), an increasing number of grouse shooting estates are constructing electric fencing to exclude wild red deer from the grouse moor and to contain flocks of domestic sheep on the moor that are used as ‘tick-mops’.

Concerns about deer fences adversely impacting on landscape and access are well documented, such as blocking access for walkers and skiers and being visually obtrusive and conspicuous.

More on fencing

Fence on a moor image
Electric fencing and gate on Millden Estate, Angus. Photo: Chris Townsend

The success of using fencing to boost the population of grouse to be killed is well understood (Smith, 2014) but the broader impact of this practice is yet to be properly assessed. As the Cairngorms National Park Authority noted in 2014,

“Whilst fencing can be beneficial in assisting habitat enhancement and can be a short-term measure, there are also concerns about cumulative impacts on habitat, deer welfare, access and sensitive upland landscapes. There is a significant risk that deer fenced out on some moors only exacerbates habitat management problems elsewhere. Inappropriately designed and located fencing to manage livestock and deer, just as fencing for other objectives, can impact negatively on the landscape and ability for people to access upland areas” (Cairngorms National Park Authority, 2014).

20km long electrified fence
A 20km long electrified fence on Glenavon Estate, Cairngorms Photo: Dave Morris

The extent of new fencing has also been raised as an issue, for example the Cairngorms National Park Authority acknowledges that in much of the Angus Glens deer are “virtually excluded by fencing in favour of management for grouse” (Cairngorms National Park Authority, 2016), in apparent contravention of best practice guidelines which state that where deer have been historically present, moors should not maintain zero deer densities.

More on hill tracks

Hill track with collapsed peat
Picture showing track next to collapsed peat – Courtesy of Ramblers Scotland

Private tracks constructed for agriculture or forestry use have been allowed under Permitted Development Rights (PDRs) since 1947, which exempts them from the normal planning process. This has allowed tracks to be constructed without application for planning permission, the satisfaction of minimum standards, or any need to inform local authorities, statutory bodies, or the general public.

Despite PDRs never having been available for game shooting, many of these tracks have either been built unlawfully or with the pretence that there is an agricultural operation being carried out (most frequently this has been the keeping of a flock of sheep to act as tick mops). In recent years, as grouse management has intensified, and the scale of the damage has increased.

Monadhliaths Hill Tracks
Courtesy of Raptor Persecution UK

Concerns have been raised repeatedly about the damaging impact of these tracks (e.g. Scottish Environment Link, 2017) and include:

  • Serious and wide-reaching visual impacts, leading to the loss of visual and environmental amenity;
  • Damage to sensitive vegetation and soils, especially in upland environments; 
  • Increased disturbance to wildlife;
  • The destruction of, and consequent loss of stored carbon from, large areas of peatland;
  • Initiation of erosion that often spreads over very large areas and causes silt run-off into waterways with adverse consequences for sensitive wildlife such as freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera);
  • Damage to or destruction of geological and geomorphological features;
  • Devaluation of recreational opportunities;
  • Potential damage to tourism. 
More hill tracks
New grouse butt construction with Firmounth and Scottish Rights of Way sign indicating junction between the ancient Firmounth and Fungle routes (Grid Ref. NO499853) Photo: James Carron

Recommendation

Road building on moors should be subject to the same planning permissions as any other road

Tracks built on land used for shooting and field sports should under full planning control, as well as all hill tracks proposed in National Parks and on land designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest.

Related Content

Scotland’s Grouse Moors: Background

Heather moorlands that are sometimes regarded as an iconic part of the Scottish landscape are, in re …
Find out more

Mass outdoor medication

To try to encourage a consistently high population density of grouse available to kill, one of the i …
Find out more

Land Use

Almost a fifth of Scotland has been made into a grouse moor. Estimates vary from 12% to over 18% but …
Find out more

« Land Use
Killing protected birds of prey »

Tagged With: medicated grit

© 2019. 

Revive

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. More info Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy